• Home

  • Custom Ecommerce
  • Application Development
  • Database Consulting
  • Cloud Hosting
  • Systems Integration
  • Legacy Business Systems
  • Security & Compliance
  • GIS

  • Expertise

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Careers

  • CasePointer

  • VisionPort

  • Contact
  • Our Blog

    Ongoing observations by End Point Dev people

    Double habtm Relationship Between Models

    Steph Skardal

    By Steph Skardal
    November 4, 2011

    Oh, man! It’s been a month since my last blog article. End Pointers Brian Buchalter, Evan Tann, Phunk, and I have been working on a sizable Ruby on Rails project for a client. We’ve been excited to work with Rails 3.1 and work on a project that presents many unique and interesting web application challenges.

    Today I wanted to write about the fairly simple task of defining two has and belongs to many (or many to many) associations between the same models, which is something I haven’t seen often in Rails applications.

    Data Model

    First, let’s look at the data model and discuss the business case for the data model. As shown above, the data model excerpt contains four tables. Users is the standard users table, which uses devise for user authentication. Groups are intended to be a group of users that will be allowed to do some combination of controller#action in our application. In our case, groups have many members (or users), but they also have many owners, who are allowed to manage the group. And obviously on the user side, users can exist as a member or an owner in many groups.

    The Code

    The groups_users relationship is a standard has and belongs to many relationship. The User class defines its relationship to groups:

    class User < ActiveRecord::Base
      ....
      has_and_belongs_to_many :groups
      ...
    end
    

    And the Group class defines it’s relationship to users:

    class Group < ActiveRecord::Base
      ...
      has_and_belongs_to_many :users
      ...
    end
    

    Rails makes it fairly easy to define has_and_belongs_to_many associations and override the join table, class name, and foreign key, which is applicable to the groups_owners relationship. Here, the User class defines it’s relationship to owned_groups, and specifies the join_table, class name, and foreign key:

    class User < ActiveRecord::Base
      ....
      has_and_belongs_to_many :owned_groups, :class_name => "Group", :join_table => "groups_owners", :foreign_key => "owner_id"
      ...
    end
    

    And the Group model has similar overrides (except in this case, we override the association foreign key):

    class Group < ActiveRecord::Base
      ..
      has_and_belongs_to_many :owners, :association_foreign_key => "owner_id", :join_table => "groups_owners", :class_name => "User"
      ..
    end
    

    And that’s how to define the has and belong to many relationship between two of the same models! Obviously in our case, we can easily call and modify these associations, by calling some_user.groups, some_user.owned_groups, some_group.owners, and some_group.users.

    Extras

    Here I’ve also created a couple of instance methods on the Group and User model to make it easy to pull the aggregate of owners and users (Group) and owned_groups and groups (User):

    class User < ActiveRecord::Base
      ...
      def all_groups
        (self.groups + self.owned_groups).uniq
      end
      ...
    end
    

    And:

    class Group < ActiveRecord::Base
      ...
      def all_members
        (self.owners + self.users).uniq
      end
      ...
    end
    

    Performance techniques such as calling raw SQL or with Rails low-level caching can potentially be applied to these methods, since I would not expect them to be highly performing as they are shown above. Examples of raw SQL and Rails low-level caching are described here!

    ruby rails


    Comments